<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the &#8220;Save the UNB Woodlot&#8221; people are wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/</link>
	<description>New content whenever I can think of something to write</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t a recreation area but it is used for teaching and a habitat to many species. Building from costco has caused run offs into the D.U. pond and flooding. there where many places a costco could have went up but UNB sold it to costco anyways because money will always be more valuble than trees...

sincerly 
unhappy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t a recreation area but it is used for teaching and a habitat to many species. Building from costco has caused run offs into the D.U. pond and flooding. there where many places a costco could have went up but UNB sold it to costco anyways because money will always be more valuble than trees&#8230;</p>
<p>sincerly<br />
unhappy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-422</guid>
		<description>tearing down forests whether it is for a environmentally friendly store or a faster ride home is never better for our environments health than leaving the trees. trees clean the air while stores add to the mounting pollution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tearing down forests whether it is for a environmentally friendly store or a faster ride home is never better for our environments health than leaving the trees. trees clean the air while stores add to the mounting pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamespotting &#187; Costco rezoning passed</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamespotting &#187; Costco rezoning passed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-302</guid>
		<description>[...] is not the case as it is not an honest way to debate things. Yes, some of the opposition has been misleading people, but the debate has raised some serious issues about the need for better urban [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not the case as it is not an honest way to debate things. Yes, some of the opposition has been misleading people, but the debate has raised some serious issues about the need for better urban [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamespotting &#187; Why the &#8220;Save the UNB Woodlot&#8221; people are still wrong</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamespotting &#187; Why the &#8220;Save the UNB Woodlot&#8221; people are still wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-259</guid>
		<description>[...] stated in the previous posting about this issue, developement on the woodlot can be slowed or even stopped by using the correct [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stated in the previous posting about this issue, developement on the woodlot can be slowed or even stopped by using the correct [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamespotting &#187; Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside learns how the Internet works</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamespotting &#187; Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside learns how the Internet works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-166</guid>
		<description>[...] boards and wall open). Two of the deleted links were anti-development and the other one went to a link on this site. The discussion board and wall soon filled up with cries of censorship. His second lesson is that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] boards and wall open). Two of the deleted links were anti-development and the other one went to a link on this site. The discussion board and wall soon filled up with cries of censorship. His second lesson is that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamespotting</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamespotting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Rob, the wetland that is to be filled in isn&#039;t ecologically sensitive, it is a holding pond that was created in the 1980s. It will be relocated elsewhere. Provincial law prohibits anyone from filling in an ecologically sensitive wetland (which is why there&#039;s that fuss about the filling in of the bog on Bishop Dr).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, the wetland that is to be filled in isn&#8217;t ecologically sensitive, it is a holding pond that was created in the 1980s. It will be relocated elsewhere. Provincial law prohibits anyone from filling in an ecologically sensitive wetland (which is why there&#8217;s that fuss about the filling in of the bog on Bishop Dr).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I think the big concern is that we&#039;re filling in wetland to build these stores. A &quot;SmartCity&quot; should have a better planning mechanism that avoids development in ecologically sensitive areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the big concern is that we&#8217;re filling in wetland to build these stores. A &#8220;SmartCity&#8221; should have a better planning mechanism that avoids development in ecologically sensitive areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orser</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/01/19/why-the-save-the-unb-woodlot-people-are-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Orser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=218#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t think we need half the stores that will eventually fills those locations.  Although a good argument could be made for a Costco since people already drive to Moncton to enjoy life sized bottles of Aunt Jemima.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t think we need half the stores that will eventually fills those locations.  Although a good argument could be made for a Costco since people already drive to Moncton to enjoy life sized bottles of Aunt Jemima.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

