Comments on: City of Fredericton web site double-fail http://lamespotting.com/2009/10/21/city-of-fredericton-web-site-double-fail/ New content whenever I can think of something to write Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:21:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Brad D http://lamespotting.com/2009/10/21/city-of-fredericton-web-site-double-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-827 Brad D Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:32:08 +0000 http://lamespotting.com/?p=895#comment-827 Actually, someone must have linked to it somewhere, it is likely somewhere linked to on the city of fredericton page, otherwise google would not have found it either. The "error" is most likly not that it wasn't released, it was released, it just wasn't easily visible for users, which is subjective after all. Actually, someone must have linked to it somewhere,

it is likely somewhere linked to on the city of fredericton page, otherwise google would not have found it either.

The “error” is most likly not that it wasn’t released, it was released, it just wasn’t easily visible for users, which is subjective after all.

]]> By: Tim Scammell http://lamespotting.com/2009/10/21/city-of-fredericton-web-site-double-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-732 Tim Scammell Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:12:24 +0000 http://lamespotting.com/?p=895#comment-732 That's interesting. I had a similar situation a while ago on another site. I wonder if it's just human error or laziness that fails to post the link to the information? That’s interesting. I had a similar situation a while ago on another site. I wonder if it’s just human error or laziness that fails to post the link to the information?

]]>