<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of social media use regarding the NB Power sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/</link>
	<description>New content whenever I can think of something to write</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silencing the Spiral of Silence Online Leads to Shouting on a Legislative Lawn &#171; Social Media in Public Communication</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>Silencing the Spiral of Silence Online Leads to Shouting on a Legislative Lawn &#171; Social Media in Public Communication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=931#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>[...] has whittled down, but was up to 140 000 in its heyday. A review of the social media can be found here. Although the facebook group member grew into the thousands, it wasn’t until protesters marched [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has whittled down, but was up to 140 000 in its heyday. A review of the social media can be found here. Although the facebook group member grew into the thousands, it wasn’t until protesters marched [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamespotting</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamespotting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=931#comment-750</guid>
		<description>There were just too many blogs to cover, I couldn&#039;t review every one of them. I think we&#039;re at the point now that we can expect a lot of good blog articles on any controversial subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were just too many blogs to cover, I couldn&#8217;t review every one of them. I think we&#8217;re at the point now that we can expect a lot of good blog articles on any controversial subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=931#comment-748</guid>
		<description>and blogs???

:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and blogs???</p>
<p> <img src='http://lamespotting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Wren</title>
		<link>http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lamespotting.com/?p=931#comment-746</guid>
		<description>A problem with those last two, the yay and nay Facebook groups, is that to engage you must join and that suggests you support the position they take. I have a problem with my presence being taken as being either for or against simply because I want to engage in a conversation. However, I don&#039;t really see how they could avoid this -- I suppose it depends on what the purpose of each page was set up for. In both cases, it seems they were created to generate support rather than debate.

One you missed is David Campbell&#039;s blog (http://davidwcampbell.com/) where I&#039;ve found the most interesting debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A problem with those last two, the yay and nay Facebook groups, is that to engage you must join and that suggests you support the position they take. I have a problem with my presence being taken as being either for or against simply because I want to engage in a conversation. However, I don&#8217;t really see how they could avoid this &#8212; I suppose it depends on what the purpose of each page was set up for. In both cases, it seems they were created to generate support rather than debate.</p>
<p>One you missed is David Campbell&#8217;s blog (<a href="http://davidwcampbell.com/" rel="nofollow">http://davidwcampbell.com/</a>) where I&#8217;ve found the most interesting debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

