Comments on: Review of social media use regarding the NB Power sale http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/ New content whenever I can think of something to write Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:11:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Lamespotting http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-750 Lamespotting Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:56:53 +0000 http://lamespotting.com/?p=931#comment-750 There were just too many blogs to cover, I couldn't review every one of them. I think we're at the point now that we can expect a lot of good blog articles on any controversial subject. There were just too many blogs to cover, I couldn’t review every one of them. I think we’re at the point now that we can expect a lot of good blog articles on any controversial subject.

]]> By: Charles LeBlanc http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-748 Charles LeBlanc Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:01:21 +0000 http://lamespotting.com/?p=931#comment-748 and blogs??? :( and blogs???

:(

]]> By: Bill Wren http://lamespotting.com/2009/11/16/review-of-social-media-use-regarding-the-nb-power-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-746 Bill Wren Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:24:53 +0000 http://lamespotting.com/?p=931#comment-746 A problem with those last two, the yay and nay Facebook groups, is that to engage you must join and that suggests you support the position they take. I have a problem with my presence being taken as being either for or against simply because I want to engage in a conversation. However, I don't really see how they could avoid this -- I suppose it depends on what the purpose of each page was set up for. In both cases, it seems they were created to generate support rather than debate. One you missed is David Campbell's blog (http://davidwcampbell.com/) where I've found the most interesting debate. A problem with those last two, the yay and nay Facebook groups, is that to engage you must join and that suggests you support the position they take. I have a problem with my presence being taken as being either for or against simply because I want to engage in a conversation. However, I don’t really see how they could avoid this — I suppose it depends on what the purpose of each page was set up for. In both cases, it seems they were created to generate support rather than debate.

One you missed is David Campbell’s blog (http://davidwcampbell.com/) where I’ve found the most interesting debate.

]]>